Dialogue between Crhistian and Muslim.

The First Contact between a Christian and a Muslim

C. Why have there been in the last decade many discussions held between Christians and Muslims about their beliefs?

M. I think because we both have several things in common. We believe in the One Creator Who sent many Prophets and in Jesus as the Messiah as well as the Word of God who was denied by the Jews.

Our Holy Qur'an mentions in Surah 3:45:

[Remember] when the angels said: 'O Mary! Verily Allah gives you the glad tidings of a Word from Him, his name will be Messiah Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honor in this world and in the hereafter, and of those who are near to Allah....'

Dialogues have been held everywhere in Europe, Canada, the United States, and Australia. Even the Vatican has participated: discussions were held between Vatican theologians and Egyptian Muslim scholars in Rome in 1970 and in Cairo in 1974 and 1978. Another series of discussions between Vatican theologians and Saudi Arabian Muslim scholars was held in Rome in 1974. Muslims have also been invited by many churches to present Islam.

C. If Christianity is nearly two thousand years old and Islam more than fourteen hundred years old, why were these discussions not held centuries ago?

M. For the last three to four centuries, many Asian and African countries that had been ruled by Muslims were colonized by Britain France, Holland, Belgium, Spain, and Portugal. Many Christian missionary and religious colonists tried to convert as many Muslims as they could by whatever means they had: giving medical treatment clothes, food, and jobs to the poor. However, only a few converted. A small part of the elite was converted to Christianity because of its belief that Christianity brought civilization and progress. They adopted this mistaken idea because they believed that western style progress was attained after the separation of church and state in Europe.

After the Second World War, many Muslims from Asian and African countries emigrated to the West as workers and professionals. This brought them into much closer contact with Christians. Also, students were active in introducing Islam.

C. Do you see other reasons why many dialogues are held nowadays even by their respective missions?

M. I think the gap between both is becoming smaller as each is more tolerant, although both are still competing for converts. I still remember my Christian teacher, who used to say: "Muhammad the imposter, the dreamer, the epileptic." You now find fewer writers depicting Islam in such a manner.

We Muslims feel closer to the Christians than to the Jews and disbelievers, as the Qur'an prophesied in Surah 5:82: You will find the most vehement of mankind in hostility to those who believe (to be) the Jews and the idolaters. And you will find the nearest of them in affection to those who believe (to be) those who say: 'Lo! We are Christians.' This is because there are among them priests and monks (i.e., persons entirely devoted to the service of God, as were the Muslims), and because they are not proud." Some Christian denominations are making tremendous progress now by acknowledging for the first time in history that Muhammad descended from Ishmael through his second son Kedar. The Davis Dictionary of the Bible (1980), sponsored by the Board of Christian Education of the Presbyterian Church in the USA, writes under the word "Kedar": "... A tribe descended from Ishmael (Gen. 25:13) ... The people of Kedar were Pliny's Cedrai, and from their tribe Mohammed ultimately arose." The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia quotes the following from A. S. Fulton: "... Of the Ishmaelite tribes, Kedar must have been one of the most important and thus in later times the name came to be applied to all the wild tribes of the desert. It is through Kedar ("Keidar" in Arabic) that Muslim genealogists trace the descent of Mohammed from Ishmael."

Also Smith's Bible Dictionary prints the following: "Kedar (black). Second son of Ishmael (Gen. 25:13) ... Mohammed traces his lineage to Abraham through the celebrated Koreish tribe, which sprang from Kedar. The Arabs in the Hejaz are called Beni Harb (men of war), and are Ishmaelites as of old, from their beginning. Palgrave says their language is as pure now as when the Koran was written (A.D. 610), having remained unchanged more than 1200 years; a fine proof of the permanency of Eastern Institutions."

The biggest asset brought by Muslim immigrants to the West is not their manpower but Islam, which is now taking root here. Many mosques and Islamic centers have been established and many people have reverted to Islam. I prefer the word "reverted" and not "converted," as everybody is born in submission to Allah‹Islam‹and so being a Muslim is the nature of every single individual. The parents or the community convert him to Judaism, Christianity, other faiths, or atheism.

This is also a proof that Islam is not spreading by the sword but simply by propagation on the part of Muslim individuals or groups. We don't have special missions organized as in Christian missions.

The world population has increased 136 percent from 1934 through 1984, Christianity with 47 percent and Islam with 235 percent. These figures can be checked in The Plain Truth, February 1984, in its fiftieth anniversary issue, quoting from The World Almanac and Book of Facts 1935, and The Reader's Digest Almanac and Yearbook 1983.

C. If all three religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam, claim to emanate from the One and same Creator, why do they differ?

M. All prophets from Adam to Muhammad were sent with the same message: man's total submission to Allah. In Arabic, this submission is called "Islam," which also means peace, peace between the Creator and His creatures. Unlike the names Judaism and Christianity, the name Islam was given by Allah Himself, as mentioned in Surah 5:3: This day I have perfected your religion for you and completed My favor on you, and have chosen for you Islam as your way of life. Neither "Judaism" nor "Christianity" is found in the Bible or in a Bible dictionary. No Israelite prophet said the word "Judaism." Jesus never claimed to establish Christianity and never called himself a Christian. The word "Christian" is mentioned only three times in the New Testament and first by pagans and Jews in Antioch about 43 A.D., long after Jesus had left this earth. Read in Acts 11:26: "... And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch."

Later by King Agrippa II to Paul in Acts 26:28: "Then Agrippa said unto Paul" Almost thou persuades" me to be a Christian.' '

So the name Christian was first given by foes rather than friends. And finally by Peter in his letter to comfort the faithful in I Peter 4: 16: "Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed.... "

The first Muslim on earth was not Muhammad but Abraham, who submitted totally to Allah. But Islam as a way of life had been revealed to other prophets prior to Abraham, such as Adam and Noah. Then Islam follows as the way of life for all humanity.

C. How could Abraham be a Muslim? It is known that he was a Jew.

M. A Jew? Who told you that?

C. We are taught that, so it must be confirmed by the Bible.

M. Can you show me where in the Bible it says that he was a Jew? If you can't find it quickly, let me help you. Read Genesis 11:31.

C. "And Terah took Abram his son, and Lot the son of Haran his son's son, and Sarai his daughter in-law, his son Abram's wife, and they went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan; and they came unto Haran and dwelt there."

M. So Abraham who was born in Ur of Chaldees could not have been a Jew. First because Ur of Chaldees was in Mesopotamia, which is now a part of Iraq. He was then more an Arab than a Jew. Secondly the name "Jew" came after the existence of Judah, the great grandson of Abraham (see chart on page 4). Read further, Genesis 12:4 and 5.

C. " ... and Abram was seventy and five years old when he departed out of Haran.... and into the land of Canaan they came.

M. So Abraham emigrated to Canaan at the age of seventy five and the Bible clearly mentioned that he was there a stranger m Genesis 17:8: "And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God." Read now Genesis 14:13.

C. "And there came one that had escaped, and told Abram the Hebrew.... " M. How can you call Abraham a Jew if the Bible itself calls him a Hebrew which means a man from the other side of the Euphrates. It also means pertaining to Eber, a descendant of Shem. Read now in Genesis 32:28 what happened to the name of Jacob after wrestling with an angel.

C. "And he said: 'Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel; for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.'"

M. So Abraham was a Hebrew. The descendants of Jacob were Israelites consisting of the twelve tribes. Judah was nicknamed "Jew" so that only Judah's descendants were called Jews originally. To know who Moses really was, read Exodus 6:16-20.

C. "And these are the names of the sons of Levi according to their generations; Ghershon, and Kohath, and Merari.... And the sons of Kohath: Amram.... And Amram took him Jochebed his father's sister to wife; and she bore him Aaron and Moses."

M. So Moses was not a Jew, because he was not descended from Judah, but a Levite. Moses was the "law giver" (Torah is law) to the children of Israel.

C. How can you explain that?

M. Because we are using the Holy Qur'an as standard. You can explain the Bible and correct the Jewish and Christian prejudice with the context of the Qur'an. It is the last revealed book and has never been corrupted or adulterated. Its contents has been guaranteed by Allah in Surah 2:2: This is the Scripture whereof there is no doubt... and also in Surah 15:9: No doubt We have sent down the Qur'an and surely We will guard it (from corruption). This verse is a challenge to mankind. It is a clear fact that more than fourteen hundred years have passed and not a single word of this Qur'an has been changed although disbelievers tried their utmost to change it, but they failed miserably in their efforts. As it is mentioned in this Holy Verse: "We will guard this Book" by Allah, He has guarded it.

On the contrary, all the other holy books (Torah, Psalms, Gospels etc.) have been adulterated in the form of additions, deletions or alterations from the original.

C. What does the Qur'an say about Abraham and Moses that you can deduce from the Bible?

M. In Surah 3:65:

O people of the Scripture [Jews and Christians]! Why do you dispute about Abraham, while the Torah and the Gospel were not revealed till after him? Have you then no sense?

And in Surah 3:67:

Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but he was a true Muslim (worshiper of none but Allah alone) and he joined none in worship with Allah.

In Surah 2:140:

Or say you that Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob and the twelve sons of Jacob were Jews or Christians? Say (of Muhammad), 'Do you know better or does Allah? And who is more unjust than he who conceals the testimony he has from Allah?' And Allah is not unaware of what you do. Of course they were not Jews or Christians, as the name "Jews" came after Judah and the name "Christians" came long after Jesus had left.

C. It feels strange to hear the name Allah. Why don't you say "God" if you speak English?

M. Yes, indeed, the name "Allah" seems to be strange to non-Muslims, but this name has been used by all prophets since Adam until Muhammad. It is a contraction of the two Arabic words AIlah, i.e., The God. By dropping the letter "I," you will find the word Allah. According to its position in an Arabic sentence, it can have the form "Allaha," which is close to the Hebrew name of the Creator, i.e. "Eloha." But the Jews are using wrongly the plural form "Elohim," which denotes more than one God. The word "Allaha" sounds closer to the Aramaic word for God used by Jesus, namely, "Alaha" (see Encyclopedia Britannica 1980 under "Allah" and "Elohim"). So while the name "Allah" is strange to non-Muslims, it is not strange to all prophets from Adam to Muhammad, as they propagated in principle the same Islam‹total submission‹and the word "Allah" denotes the personal name of the Supreme Being. It is not subject to plurality or gender, so there is no such thing as "Allahs," or a male or female "Allah," as is the case with Gods or God and Goddess. It is confusing to use the word God, as many English speaking Christians consider Jesus as God. Even the word "Creator" is also confusing, as many Christians maintain that Jesus created the world. Not only the name "Allah" is strange, but also the way Muslims worship Allah with ablution, bowing, kneeling, prostration and fasting is strange to non-Muslims, but not strange to all of the prophets. While ablution (washing of face, arms, feet, and moistening of the hair) prior to worship is not done by modern Christians, it is required of Muslims and previous prophets, as seen in the following biblical passages: Exodus 40:31-32: "And Moses and Aaron and his sons washed their hands and their feet thereat; When they went into the tent of the congregation, and when they came near unto the altar, they washed; as the Lord commanded Moses." Although Paul made many changes in Jesus' teaching, he was faithful in respect to ablution, as seen in Acts 21:26: "Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple'..." Muslim women perform their prayer with their head covered, as in I Corinthians 11:5-6, 13: "But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonourerh her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.... Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered" Muslims worship with bowing, kneeling, prostration, and without shoes 1 , as was done by previous prophets: Psalms 95:6: "O come, let us worship and bow down: let us kneel before the Lord our maker"; Joshua 5: 14: "And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship''; I Kings 18:42: "And Elijah went up to the top of Carmel; and he cast himself down upon the earth, and put his face between his knees"; Numbers 20:6: "... and they [Moses and Aaron] fell upon their faces: and the glory of the Lord appeared upon them"; Genesis 17:3: "And Abram fell on his face: and God talked with him, saying ...", and Exodus 3:5 and Acts 7:33: "And he [God] said [to Moses], 'Draw not nigh hither: put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground."'

A Christian will be very surprised to learn that the pilgrimage (hajj), which consists of Muslims circumambulating around the sacred stone (i.e., the Ka'bah) in Makkah, had been performed by many prophets, even by Israelite prophets.

C. I never read anything about the pilgrimage or the sacred stone (i.e., Ka'bah) in the Bible.

M. This has been mentioned clearly several times but is usually overlooked by those who read the Bible. For example:

1. Jacob, on his way to Padan aram, saw a vision and built the next morning a pillar of stone which he called Beth EI, i.e. the House of the Lord (Genesis 28:18-19).

2. Years later the same Prophet, Jacob, was ordered by Allah to go to Bethel (Genesis 35:4, 14-15). Jacob removed all of the strange gods prior to going there. Later, Prophet Muhammad also removed all idols around the sacred stone (i.e., Ka'bah in Makkah).

3. Another pillar was built by Jacob and his father-in-law, Laban, (Genesis 31:45-49): "And Jacob took a stone, and set it up for a pillar. And Jacob said unto his brethren: 'Gather stones.' And they took stones, and made a heap; and they did eat there upon the heap. And Laban called it Jegar sahadutha, but Jacob called it Galeed ... and Mizpah, for he said: 'The Lord watch between me and thee ..."'

4. Jephthah and Ammon had a war against each other. Jephthah swore to the Lord in Mizpah of Gilead to sacrifice his only daughter if he won. He did win, and burnt his daughter there alive as an offering to the Lord (Judges 11:29-39).

5. Four hundred thousand swordsmen from the eleven tribes of Israel swore before the Lord in Mizpeh to exterminate the tribes of Benjamin (Judges 20 and 21).

6. The children of Israel, under Samuel, swore in Mizpeh to destroy their idols if they won against the Philistines (I Samuel 7).

7. The whole nation of Israel assembled in Mizpeh when Samuel was appointed king of Israel (I Samuel 10).

It is obvious now that there is no Mizpah left in the world, except the oldest one in the Holy City of Makkah built by Abraham and his son Ishmael, from whom later Prophet Muhammad arose. Muslims are really the followers of all prophets. I can tell you other things about Muslims, Islam and Muhammad in the Bible, but why should you know this if you are not looking for the truth?

C. I am sure of my own belief as a Christian but I would also like to know more about both religions. I sometimes feel ridiculed as a Christian after reading books written by Muslims.

M. Did it affect you in your religious life?

C. Yes. I am not going to Church as regularly as before. I have been secretly reading books written by Muslims. I have asked several Muslims to explain matters that were not clear to me, but have not yet been satisfied. I am looking for a belief that I can rely on, that can give me peace of mind, that is scientifically acceptable, and one that I don't have to believe in blindly.

M. I appreciate your sentiments. However, as we are not allowed to force people to become Muslim, I want to be sure that you are really interested in learning the truth before I continue.

C. You mean that I can believe what I want and that nobody can force me to believe in something else?

M. Yes, for the Qur'an says that there is no compulsion in religion.

C. Then why are Muslims calling other people to accept Islam?

M. As Christians ask the Jews to accept Jesus as the Messiah, we Muslims ask the Christians, as well as Jews and all mankind, to accept Muhammad as the seal of the prophets. Our Prophet Muhammad said: "Convey my message, even one ayah (verse of the Holy Qur'an)."

Also, Isaiah mentioned in chapter 21:13: "The burden upon Arabia," which means the responsibility of the Muslim Arabs, to spread Islam. Isaiah mentioned this after he saw in a vision a chariot of asses and a chariot of camels (21:7): "And he saw a chariot with a couple of horsemen, a chariot of asses, and a chariot of camels; and he hearkened diligently with much heed."

The chariot of asses turned out to be Jesus, who entered Jerusalem (John 12: 14; Matthew 21: 5). Who then was the chariot of camels? It could not be other than Muhammad, who came about six hundred years after the advent of Jesus. If this is not accepted, then this prophecy has not yet been fulfilled.

C. Your explanation stimulates me to review the Bible more carefully. I would like to have more discussions with you.

M. Yes, if you are successful in this world, it doesn't mean that you will be successful in the hereafter. The hereafter is much better and more lasting than this life. People are now becoming more materialistic and secular. Let's meet some more and discuss the differences frankly and without prejudice. Islam is based on reason, and you should not just accept it. Even your Bible says: "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good" (I Thessalonians 5:21).

C. You mentioned just now a "chariot of camels" from Isaiah and drew the conclusion that it was Muhammad. Is he then prophesied in the Bible?

M. Sure.

C. In the Old or New Testament?

M. In both. But you cannot recognize him in the Bible as long as you don't believe in the oneness of God. As long as you still believe in the Trinity, the divinity of Jesus, the divine son ship of Jesus, and the doctrines of Original Sin and Atonement. All of these were made by men. Jesus prophesied that people would worship him uselessly and believe in doctrines made by men: "But in vain they do worship me teaching for doctrines the commandments of men" (Matthew 15:9).

The Holy Bible

Fahaman “Wahhabi” yang menghantui masyarakat sekarang.

Sungguh amat “melucukan” apabila aku pulang ke kampung sekitar beberapa minggu yang lalu, sahabat-sahabat lamaku di kampung kecoh memperbincangkan isu “wahhabi”. Sungguh hangat kelihatan gaya dan bunyi nada bicaranya.

Mengapa aku menyatakan perbincangan mereka itu “melucukan”? Mananya tidak lucu... Berbicara berdegar-degar! Menyatakan bahawa geng-geng “wahhabi” ni sebagai seolah-olah cuba menghidupkan suatu ajaran dan sedang berusaha untuk menerapkan serta membangunkan kaedah beragama bentuk baru. Aku fikir apa lah agaknya fahaman sesat yang tidak betulnya. Rupanya tidak lebih dari sekadar bualan dan cakap-cakap tidak berhujjah, kering fakta ilmiyah-nya.

Menurut mereka, fahaman wahhabi sudah mula menular di sekitar UTM Skudai!!! Mereka mengancam kefahaman dan pegangan agama masyarakat setempat. Habis semua pelajar-pelajar UTM nanti. Mereka masuk universiti untuk jadi seorang manusia ber-skill profesional dan meraih ijazah mahupun diploma untuk jaminan masa depan mereka. Namun, angkara wahhabi, nantinya mereka jadi sesat pula! Begitulah antara kenyataan-kenyataan mereka ketika lepak di restoran mamak 24 jam depan Kuittho (sekarang UTHM) tempoh hari.

Aku mula bertanya kepada sahabat-sahabat-ku yang begitu rancak kelihatannya berbual tentang ancaman “wahhabi” tersebut. Aku memulakan dengan sebaris pertanyaan,

““Wahhabi” tu mende?”

Dengan pantas salah seorang kawanku, Kamil menjawab, ““Wahhabi” ni dia antara ciri-ciri dia tak baca Qunut bila solat subuh, kalau solat tangan dia letak kat dada, lepas solat tak baca doa dengan imam, tak baca zikir dan ada tu terus je cabut... tak hormat jema’ah solat langsung. Emm, lagi satu diorang ni kalau duduk tahiyat, jari telunjuk diorang mesti gerak-gerak.”

Aku mengeluh, sambil hatiku agak tersenyum, “Owh... Macam tu ke?”

“Tu je ke, takde definisi yang specific ke?”

Kamil menambah, “Diorang ni dalam bab perkara ghaib percaya bahawa Allah ni ada tangan, ada kaki, ada mata, boleh ketawa. Tu la yang aku tahu, seingat aku.”

Aku menerima jawabannya, “OooOOoo, faham la sikit-sikit.” Lalu, seorang lagi tampil cuba menambah, “Geng-geng wahhabi ni ikut fahaman Ibnu Taimiyah sebenarnya. Ibnu Taimiyah ni kiranya, otai wahhabi la... Fahaman ni asalnya diasaskan dan dikembangkan oleh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab.” Kata seorang lagi sahabatku, si Zakaria, teman lama yang sangat prihatin.

Dia menambah, “Ni, ada sorang ustaz la bagi tau kat aku...”

Emm, aku pun cuba merungkai bagi tujuan membuka kotak pemikiran mereka. “Setahu aku, di Arab Saudi tu diorang pun kalau lepas solat tak baca doa. Yang aku faham, diorang baca doa sendiri-sendiri. Maksudnya, tak lah doa berjema’ah. Perkara ni dah lama jugak aku perhatikan, kira-kira dah tiga kali puasa Ramadhan yang lalu. Emm, kan ke time bulan Ramadhan tu TV1 (RTM1) tiap-tiap malam siarkan live solat terawikh dan ‘Isya’ berjema’ah dari Makkah.”

Mereka mula berkerut, “Owh, macam tu pulak ke, tak perasan lah pulak aku.” Mereka menambah, “Tapi, bukanke kat Makkah tu mazhab dia ada lain sikit dari Malaysia. Malaysia kan pakai mazhab imam Syafi’i.”

Aku meneruskan bicara, “Kenapa dengan mazhab? Apa yang lainnya, tang mana yang tak sama tu. Kenapa boleh tak sama ye? Kalau tak sama, maksudnya, sesat ke diorang?”

Sekali lagi mereka kelihatan tidak senang. “Emm, tak lah sesat, tapi tak samalah.”

Aku menambah, “Owh... oklah... sebenarnya, dalam bab baca doa lepas solat ni, imam Syafi’i sendiri kata dalam kitab dia yang terkenal bahawa berzikir lepas solat ni kalau ikut sunnah dan hadis yang sahih, ia patutnya dilakukan sorang-sorang dan bukannya secara berjama’ah dan bukan juga dengan suara yang kuat-kuat, tapi slow-slow je... cukuplah untuk dengar sorang-sorang je.”

Mereka bertambah runsing malah seakan-akan tidak berpuas hati. Aku terus menambah, “Korang tak percaya ke? Emm, kalau tak caya... korang gi cari kitab al-Umm, kitab karangan imam Syafi’i sendiri, kat dalam tu ada explain pasal bab ni. Then, dalam tafsir Ibnu Katsir pun ada. Korang rujuk dalam tafsiran dia berkenaan ayat ke 205, dari surah al-A’raaf, surah yang ke tujuh dalam al-Qur’an. Kalau nak tengok kitab tu, dalam internet pun ada, yang bahasa inggeris la tapi. Yang bahasa melayu pulak, aku ada, tapi kat umah sewa aku kat Shah Alam la. Tak pun, kalau korang balik kampus nanti, cuba try tengok kat library kampus korang. Maybe ada rasanya. Tak pun, cek la dulu ayat Qur’an yang aku sebut tadi, tengok maskud terjemahan dia. Tengok jugak macam mana Nabi Zakaria berdoa dalam surah Maryam, ayat 3, yang mana dia berdoa dengan suara yang lembut, dan bukan kuat-kuat pakai microfon macam yang orang ramai buat tu...”

Mereka tidak puasa hati, “Emmm, betul ke ni Nawi... ko jangan main-main bab agama ni. Ko main petik macam tu aje... Mana ko belajar bab-bab macam ni. Kat sekolah dulu kita kan sekolah agama sampai darjah 6 dan masuk darjah khas lagi... tak de pernahnya pun sebut bab-bab pelik cam ni.”

“Sebab-sebab diorang tak pernah sebut tu lah, korang kena amik inisiatif cek yang amalan-amalan kita ni menepati sunnah ke tidak. Dah terang-terang kat sekolah takde bincang dan bahas bab ni, yang kita main ikut kenapa ek?” Aku terus menjawab.

Lagi lah mereka tak puas hati, tapi seperti ada tanda yang positif apabila mereka melanjutkan pertanyaan kepadaku pula... “Emm, kalau macam tu, macam mana pulak dengan persoalan tangan letak kat dada time tengah berdiri (qiyam) dalam solat?”

Aku cuba membantu, “Owh, yang tu pulak ke? Aku ada jugak cek dalam buku yang aku beli beberapa bulan yang lalu, buku tentang sifat solat yang ditulis oleh Sheikh Muhammad Nasiruddin al-Albani. Buku tu ada tiga jilid untuk edisi terjemahan. Memang sangat-sangat ilmiyah-lah perbahasannya. Kalau korang berminat nak tahu berkenaan bab-bab solat ni secara detail, boleh je aku bagi pinjam buku tu. Tapi tunggu aku balik kampung lagi sekali nanti la. Sekarang buku tu ada kat Shah Alam.”

“Apa yang dia explain pasal bab ni, bab apa ni... bab letak tangan kat dada!” Abboy bertanya kelihatan ingin tahu.

“Dalam buku tu menyatakan ada hadis yang menerangkan akan hal tu, hadisnya sahih. Diriwayatkan oleh Ibnu Khuzaimah, seingat aku. Juga bukan dia saja kalau tak silap aku, tapi aku lupa, sapa lagi ek yang riwayatkan. Nanti aku rujuk semula.” Sambungku.

Aku tambah lagi, “Malah, bukan je ada hadis sahih, malah isu ni semua perkara lama... Cuma ramai orang yang tak tahu, coz malas mengkaji dan anggap agama ni asal solat je dah cukup bagus la kot... Tu yang banyak perkara-perkara penting jadi miss tu.” Aku tidak berpuas hati, macam tak berapa lengkap penjelasan aku... lalu menambah, “Antara ulama’ yang menyatakan akan sunnahnya meletakkan tangan di atas dada adalah imam Ibnu Hajar al-‘Asqalani, iaitu salah seorang imam dalam Mazhab Syafi’i. Selain tu, imam asy-Syaukani pun menyatakan hal yang sama. Dalam mazhab lain, antaranya Mazhab Maliki, mereka pun berpegang dengan pendapat yang sama.”

“Wahh, hebat ko ingat semua mende-mende ni... mana ko belajar?” Kadi bertanya.

“Aku baca sikit-sikit je. Selain tu, aku banyak ikut kuliah dari ustaz-ustaz yang baru balik belajar hadis dari Jordan, Mesir, Makkah, dan Madinah. Aku pun banyak jugak search kat internet perkara-perkara ni. Dan aku juga mengkaji tentang istilah “Wahhabi” ni. Mula-mula pelik juga, coz pernah kuar kat muka depan paper Utusan tu.” Aku merungkai rasa ingin tahu seorang sahabat karib yang juga jiran sekampungku. Dia baru sahaja menamatkan pengajiannya dari UiTM Kampus Arau.

Kadi menambah, “Owh... patutlah aku perasan dulu masa studi kat Perlis, bila solat kat area masjid luar UiTM tu, aku rasa cam pelik semacam je la. Coz, bila habis solat je, diorang terus buat solat sunnat atau duduk sekejap and then, diorang kuar. Takde baca-baca doa ni. Cuma aku nampak adalah sebahagian tu, baca sorang-sorang.”

“Yup, macam tu lah sebenarnya... perbahasannya memang ada di kalangan para ulama. Malahan, cara tu lah yang betul sebenarnya. Tak perlu baca zikir-zikir secara beramai-ramai, dan tak perlu lah doa ramai-ramai jugak. Cukup untuk kita baca sorang-sorang dan minta apa yang kita hajatkan sorang-sorang je. Kalau nak mintakan untuk orang lain, pun boleh je doa sorang-sorang je. Itu lah sunnah yang sebenarnya. Tapi ramai yang tak tahu, kerana mungkin sikap dan budaya membaca dan mengkaji dari kalangan kita ni sangat kurang. Zaman sekarang ni, nak beramal dengan agama tak bolehlah main ikut-ikut je. Kita perlu beramal dengan hujjah dan keterangan yang jelas. Mesti ada sandaran ayat al-Qur’an-nya dan hadis-hadis yang sahih. Yang tak sahih, atau palsu, tak boleh lah pakai.” Begitulah penjelasanku yang tak seberapa ketika itu.

Lalu aku menambah beberapa jawaban untuk persoalan mereka yang seterusnya, “Pasal jari gerak-gerak tu pulak, hadis dia pun sahih. Malah ia sedia maklum dan merupakan pendapat dari kalangan kebanyakan ulama seperti imam al-Nawawi dari Mazhab Syafi’i, pendapat imam Malik, dan pendapat Imam Ahmad juga kalau tidak silap aku. Pendapat ni boleh disemak dalam banyak tempat dalam kitab-kitab ulama. Semua perkara-perkara ni perlukan rujukan dan penelitian secara detail dan ilmiyah. Sikap adil dan amanah juga amat penting. Dalam soal agama ni, kita tak boleh main cakap ikut sedap mulut dan hati je. Kena cek betul-betul dulu baru boleh cakap. Kalau tak semak betul-betul, nanti jadilah salah sangka pulak... macam yang korang bincang ni lah... tak pasal-pasal, imam Syafi’i sendiri jadi geng “Wahhabi” kalau macam tu.” Aku memperli sambil tersenyum.

“Owh, apasal macam tu pulak?” Kadi berkerut.

Aku jawab, “Ye laa... dah korang kata sapa-sapa yang tak nak berdoa lepas solat dengan imam dan tak nak zikir tu sama dengan Wahhabi. So, imam Syafi’i sendiri menyatakan zikir dan doa adalah sorang-sorang... Kalau ikut definisi korang tadi, bermakna, dia pun “Wahhabi” la...”

Zakaria pula bersuara seolah-olah belum cukup meredakan apa yang terbuku di lubuk hatinya, “Emm, Nawi... aku rasa kan... gerak-gerak jari tu macam pelik lah. Nampak janggal je. Betulke dalam solat boleh buat gerak-gerak macam tu?”

Aku mengalih pandangan kepadanya lalu cuba memberi pencerahan, “Zek, dalam bab ibadah ni, kita tak boleh ikut hati, rasa, akal dan logik. Kalau macam tu, rasa macam tak best je, macam tak logik je, terus tak payah la beribadat... macam tu? Setuju tak? Emmm, lagi satu, ada orang kristian pernah tanya kat aku, kenapa orang Islam sembayang nampak pelik, kejap angkat tangan, kejap berdiri, kejap duduk, kejap sujud, lepas tu bangun semula...? Aku kata, ini bukan persoalan pelik atau tak pelik... Persoalan pelik adalah persoalan relatif, sapa-sapa je boleh rasa pelik kalau perkara yang dirasa dan dilihat tu asalnya bukan sesuatu yang menjadi kebiasaan bagi dirinya. Apa yang nak aku tekankan kat sini adalah, sejauh mana tindakan taat kita kepada dalil-dalil yang diberikan kepada kita. Emmm, dalam al-Qur’an kan ada kata, “Kami dengar dan kami ta’at”... So, dalam bab ibadah dan terutamanya bab aqidah ni, kita kena faham, dan yakin. Ada perkara-perkara tertentu yang tidak mampu kita perolehi jawabannya bila kita terus persoalkan dan persoalkan... silap-silap, makin kusut kepala kita dibuatnya. Kemudiannya, kalau nabi sendiri buat perkara tu, bermakna nabi lah orang pertama yang buat benda-benda pelik ni. Kat al-Qur’an jugak ada sebut, “Jika benar kita mencintai Allah, maka ikutlah nabi...”.”

“Emm, fahamlah aku kirenya sikit-sikit ni...” Zek kelihatan mula bersetuju.

Kamil yang lama senyap dan hanya mengangguk, tiba-tiba bertanya... “Macam mana pulak dengan kes diorang kata Allah ni ada tangan, ada kaki, ada mata, boleh ketawa?”

Aku tersenyum dan menjawab, “Emmm, yang tu ke. Perkara-perkara tu semua ada dinyatakan dalam al-Qur’an. Selain Allah menyatakan bahawa Allah Maha Mendengar, Maha Melihat, Maha Pengasih, Maha Penyayang, Dia (Allah) juga ada menyebutkan beberapa sifat-sifat yang tertentu bagi-Nya, contohnya,

“Allah menciptakan Nabi Adam dengan kedua Tangan-Nya”... lebih kurang macam tu la maksud/mafhum salah satu ayat yang menyebut (mentioned) tentang Tangan Allah. Persoalan kaki, mata, dan ketawa tu pulak ada disebut dalam hadis-hadis Nabi yang sahih. Malah, banyak lagi sifat-sifat Allah yang lain. Tapi, kita mesti fahamlah, bila kita tahu Allah memiliki Tangan, Kaki, Mata, memiliki sifat ketawa tu semua tu... bahawa ianya tidaklah sama dengan anggota-anggota kita. Sebagaimana mendengarnya dan melihatnya Allah, tidaklah sama dengan mendengar dan melihatnya kita terhadap benda-benda yang lain. So, bila Allah memiliki Tangan, maknanya... tidaklah sama Tangan Allah itu seperti tangan kita atau makhluk-makhluk yang lain. Kalau ada orang tanya tentang bagaimananya Tangan Allah... jawab je... “Wallahu a’lam”, coz, kita tahu setakat Allah ada Tangan, dan tidak pula dijelaskan bagaimana rupanya. Maka kita hanya mengimaninya (percaya), tapi tak tahu bagaimana dan tidak bolehlah nak gambar-gambarkannya dengan bentuk-bentuk tertentu.

Lepas tu, ada pulak ayat al-Qur’an menyatakan bahawa, “Tiada sesuatu pun yang serupa dengan Dia (Allah).” Maka, kita serahkan pada-Nya. Tanpa sibuk-sibuk susah payah fikir-fikir sampai jadi kusut otak kita.”

“Owh, macam tu ke... fahamlah aku sikit-sikit... Dah berapa lama ko kaji tentang “Wahhabi” ni?” Kamil seakan-akan berpuas hati.

“Aiii..., masih nak panggil “Wahhabi” lagi ke? Bukan “Wahhabi” la. Tapi, beramal dengan ilmu la.” Aku menyatakan sambil tersenyum.

“Owh, ok, ok... aku faham dah..” Kamil kelihatannya cuba menerima.

Aku menambah, “Hope, lepas ni... korang cuba-cubalah kaji perkara ni secara detail kalau rasa tak yakin. Dalam agama ni, tak best la main ikut-ikut je. Kena faham secara ilmiyah. Sumber-sumber dia apa sume. Betul ke kita ni Mazhab Syafi’i atau, just sekadar cuma kata-kata di bibir je... Padahal imam Syafi’i sendiri tak mengakui yang kita ni pengikutnya.”

“Ok, ok... kitorang dah dapat tangkap la jugak maksud ko tu... kira ok la pendapat ko ni...”

“Haha, sikit-sikit tu ok la... boleh lah tolong-tolong jawabkan untuk korang... kalau nak lebih-lebih, aku pun tak ngaji habis mana lagi pun... Harap korang faham-faham la ok. Nanti kalau korang berminat, sms la aku, boleh aku bawakan sebahagian kitab-kitab yang aku ada. Semuanya edisi dan siap terjemah punya. Mudah faham. Kalau, nak edisi asli, boleh jugak cari sendiri kat internet. Tapi bahasa arab lah. Aku tak mampu baca yang tu. Biasa ada ustaz la yang tolong explain untuk aku.”

“Wokey Nawi, cantiklah... dah lewat malam ni... aku rasa nak balik lah... esok kita sambung sembang lagi.” Abboy mengajak aku beredar dari restorant tersebut.

“Ha’ah, ye laa... aku pun nak balik la, letih jugak petang tadi tolong mak aku angkat pasu bunga. Tapi, esok pagi-pagi lagi aku dah nak balik Shah Alam dengan Pipeng. Balik ni pun tumpang kereta dia.” Baru aku sedar, jam sudah menunjukkan waktu 12.00 tgh malam.

“Ok Nawi, kalau macam tu, nanti bila ko balik kampug lagi, ko sound la kitorang lagi.” Kadi memberi kata putus sebelum beredar.

“InsyaALLAH, oh ye Kadi, ko dah grad ni ko buat apa sekarang?” Aku bertanya dengan sedikit perasaan ingin tahu tentang Kadi.

Dia menjawab, “Tak pasti lagi, tapi aku tengah join kursus ternak kambing ni... hehe, itupun sunnah kan.. bela-bela kambing nih...”

“Owh... haha, ha’ah... kire sunnah jugaklah, insyaAllah. Ok, jumpa lagi nanti. Good luck semua.” Aku meng-iyakan kata-katanya.

Tiba-tiba Zakaria datang mendekati aku, “Nawi, ada soalan yang ko lupa kot... macam mana dengan fahaman mereka yang dikatakan mengikut pemikiran Ibnu Taimiyah tu?”

“Oh, yang tu... cuba ko cek balik zaman Ibnu Taimiyah dan zaman Muhammad Abdul Wahhab. Sapa yang datang dulu. Apa yang aku tahu, Ibnu Taimiyah datang dulu dan meninggal dunia dulu... kemudian baru Muhammad Abdul Wahhab datang. So, adalah suatu kesilapan jika kita menyatakan Ibnu Taimiyah tu “Wahhabi”... Penisbahan Wahhabi tu sebenarnya adalah suatu cubaan mereka-mereka yang anti dengan sunnah Nabi shallahu a’alaihi wa sallam, dengan menisbahkan mereka yang hendak kembali beramal dengan sunnah ni kepada nama Muhammad Abdul Wahhab. Iaitu kelompok Muhammad Abdul Wahhab, dengan term “Wahhabi” (pengikut Wahhab). Em, kalau ko nak tau... malah, seorang imam besar, Imam Ibnu Hajar yang bermazhab Syafi’i sendiri menyanjung Ibnu Taimiyah dan memberi gelaran kepada beliau sebagai “Sheikhul Islam Ibnu Taimiyah”... wallahu a’lam... Emmm, ko tak nak balik ke? Dah malam ni...”

“Owh, ha’ah... nak balik.. Ok Nawi, Thanks banyak-banyak. Ok juga explaination tu. Sedikit sebanyak dapat jugak menghilangkan beberapa kekusutan aku dalam persoalan agama dan isu semasa ni. Ok, baik-baik jalan balik Shah Alam esok.”

“Ok, ko pun sama juga Zek. Cari kerja jangan memilih sangat.” Zek salah seorang lagi sahabatku yang baru sahaja kembali ke kampung 6 bulan yang lalu setelah 5 tahun studi di US.

“Ok, insyaAllah..., As-Salaamu ‘alaikum beb...”

Bloggers Tsunami Politik.

Setelah sekian lama Malaysia di perintah oleh sebuah kerajaan yang berpaksikan SEKULARISM. Akhir-akhir ini telah melanda satu senario media yang berbeza, dimana telah membawa satu perubahan pemikiran dan perkongsian maklumat yang begitu drastik didalam politik negara.

Tidak dapat disangkal, kemajuan ICT telah membuka jalan dan peluang yang besar kepada bloggers untuk membuka ruang maklumat yang bebas dan terbuka, dimana dapat ditatapi oleh seluruh masyarakt dunia dalam sekelip mata. Inilah maklumat tanpa batasan yang dapat dibaca oleh semua pencinta teknologi maklumat.

Kerajaan telah menggunakan segala kekuatan media arus perdana untuk menyebarkan maklumat serta dakyah politik mereka, tanpa mengira kebenaran atau keadilan dalam menyampaikan maklumat. Apabila tiada kredibiliti didalam maklumat yang disampaikan, maka rakyat/maysarakat telah mencari alternatif lain untuk mendapatkan sumber berita dan maklumat, iaitu ICT.

Baru-baru ini rakyat Malaysia telah digemparkan dengan penangkapan seorang blogger terkenal yang begitu mendapat tempat dihati masyarakat bloggers. Beliau telah didakwa atas Akta Hasutan, akibat dari artikel yang beliau tulis dididalam blog MT. Adakah dunia maklumat ICT ini telah sampai kesatu titik noktah kebebebasan?

Bloggers juga telah memberi impak politik yang begitu besar didalam memberi maklumat yang berbeza dari arus perdana media yang dikuasai kerajaan. Walaupum kesahihan maklumat itu tidak dapat dipastikan, tapi ianya tetap memberi impak dalam mengimbangi maklumat yang ada. Masyarakat telah mendapat saluran maklumat alternatif dalam mengetahui sesuatu isu.

Setelah hampir 51 tahun Kerajaan Barisan Nasional memerintah Malaysia, tetapi pada piliharaya 08 March 2008 telah berubah senario politik dimana pihak pepmbangkang telah mendapat keputusan yang cemerlang memenangi 4 buah negeri Selangor, Perak, Kedah dan Pulau Pinang. Kelantan yang menjadi negeri kubu kuat pihak pembangkang telah berjaya dipertahankan didalam pilihanraya tersebut. Semuanya ini adalah kerana sumber maklumat alternatif yang telah mengubah persepsi maysarakat dalam mengetahui isu yang sebenar.